Combined Use of ECMO, Prone Positioning, and APRV in the Management of Severe COVID-19 Patients.

Background: Severe COVID-19-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) may warrant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We evaluated the safety and physiologic changes in oxygenation and hemodynamic profile during ECMO, prone positioning, and the two modalities combined in patients receiving veno-venous (VV) ECMO. Methods: Cohort study of consecutive adult patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS requiring VV-ECMO, classified into three groups: ECMO support only; Prone positioning only; and Prone positioning during ECMO. We collected hemodynamic, respiratory and ventilation variables as follows: pre-treatment, 1, 6, and 24 h post-treatment, and documented treatment-related complications. On-treatment variables were compared with pre-treatment using one-sample paired t-test with Bonferroni correction. Results: Fourteen patients (mean age 48.1 [SD 9.3] years, male [100%]) received VV-ECMO. Of those, 10 patients had data during prone positioning alone and seven had data while proned on ECMO. While on ECMO, patients had improvement in oxygen saturation, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, and minute ventilation up to 24 h post-treatment. Vasopressor requirements increased with ECMO at 1 h and 24 h post-treatment. Prone positioning was not associated with clinically significant hemodynamic or respiratory changes, either alone or during ECMO support. All patients sustained deep tissue injuries, but only those on the face or chest were related to prone positioning. Three patients required cannula replacement. In-hospital mortality was 43%. Conclusions: VV-ECMO and prone positioning in patients with COVID-19 ARDS was overall well-tolerated; however, physiologic improvements were marginal, and patients sustained deep tissue injuries. Although this was a selected population with high mortality, our data call into question the benefits of these management modalities in this severe COVID-19 population.

METHYLPREDNISOLONE VERSUS USUAL CARE FOR COVID-19-ASSOCIATED ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME

We assessed the impact of methylprednisolone (MP) vs no corticosteroid (NCS) in patients with COVID-19. B Conclusions: b MP improved mortality in COVID-19 patients with moderate-severe ARDS requiring invasive MV. B Introduction: b Dysregulated inflammation is a hallmark of SARS-CoV-2 related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) pathogenesis. [Extracted from the article] Copyright of Critical Care Medicine is the property of Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

Cytokine profiles in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support.

It has been postulated that the underlying pathophysiology of COVID-19 is mediated by cytokine storm resulting in a hyperinflammatory state. A similar kind of cytokine-storm has been described in individuals undergoing veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) support. There is therefore concern that initiation of VV ECMO support among COVID19 patients could further exacerbate this dysregulated inflammatory response. In this prospective cohort study, we describe the clinical course and cytokine fluctuations in eight subjects treated with VV ECMO for management of refractory respiratory failure from COVID19. Among all eight patients, cytokine elevations were noted among Interleukin 6 (IL-6), Interleukin 10 (IL-10), and Interleukin 2 Receptor (CD25) soluble (sIL2R). Although further research is necessary, among our cohort of patients it did not appear that initiation of VV ECMO worsened cytokine storm.